Fostering Middle School Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching via Analysis of Tasks and Student Work (2024)

  • 1.

    Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2003). Toward a practice-based theory of mathematical knowledge for teaching. In E. Simmt & B. Davis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2002 Annual Meeting of the Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group (pp. 314). CMESG/GCEDM.

  • 2.

    Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In G. Sykes and L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 332). Jossey-Bass.

  • 3.

    Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389407.

  • 4.

    Bell, C. A., Wilson, S. M., Higgins, T., & McCoach, D. B. (2010). Measuring the effects of professional development on teacher knowledge: The case of developing mathematical ideas. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(5), 479512.

  • 5.

    Ben-Chaim, D., Keret, Y., & Ilany, B. (2007). Designing and implementing authentic investigative proportional reasoning tasks: The impact on pre-service mathematics teachers’ content and pedagogical knowledge and attitudes. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10(4–6), 333340.

  • 6.

    Berk, D., Taber, S. B., Gorowara, C. C., & Poetzl, C. (2009). Developing prospective elementary teachers’ flexibility in the domain of proportional reasoning. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 11(3), 113135.

  • 7.

    Blythe, T., Allen, D., & Powell, B. S. (2015). Looking together at student work. Teachers College Press.

  • 8.

    Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 3242.

  • 9.

    Carney, M. B., Brendefur, J. L., Thiede, K., Hughes, G., & Sutton, J. (2016). Statewide mathematics professional development: Teacher knowledge, self-efficacy, and beliefs. Educational Policy, 30(4), 539572.

  • 10.

    Charalambous, C. (2010). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and task unfolding: An exploratory study. The Elementary School Journal, 110(3), 247278.

  • 11.

    Common Core Standards Writing Team. (2011, December 26). Progressions for the Common Core State Standards in Mathematics. https://commoncoretools.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/ccss_progression_rp_67_2011_11_12_corrected.pdf

  • 12.

    Council of Chief State School Officers. (2011, June 1). Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Mathematics Curriculum Materials Analysis Project. Council of Chief State School Officers. https://www.mathedleadership.org/docs/ccss/CCSSO%20Mathematics%20Curriculum%20Analysis%20Project.Whole%20Document.6.1.11.Final.docx.

  • 13.

    Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Lessons from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915945.

  • 14.

    Hatisaru, V., & Erbas, A. K. (2017). Mathematical knowledge for teaching the function concept and student learning outcomes. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(4), 703722.

  • 15.

    Hill, H., & Ball, D. L. (2009). The curious—and crucial—case of mathematical knowledge for teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 91(2), 6871.

  • 16.

    Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L., & Schilling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372400.

  • 17.

    Hill, H. C., Kapitula, L., & Umland, K. (2011). A validity argument approach to evaluating teacher value-added scores. American Educational Research Journal, 48(3), 794831.

  • 18.

    Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371406.

  • 19.

    Hilton, A., Hilton, G., Dole, S., & Goos, M. (2016). Promoting middle school students’ proportional reasoning skills through an ongoing professional development programme for teachers. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 92(2), 193219.

  • 20.

    Hoover, M., Mosvold, R., Ball, D. L., & Lai, Y. (2016). Making progress on mathematical knowledge for teaching. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 13(1&2), 334.

  • 21.

    Ilany, B., Keret, Y., & Ben-Chaim, D. (2004). Implementation of a model using authentic investigative activities for teaching ratio and proportion in pre-service teacher education. Proceedings of the 28th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 3, pp. 8188). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237801780.

  • 22.

    Izsak, A., Jacobson, E., & de Araujo, Z. (2012). Measuring mathematical knowledge for teaching fractions with drawn quantities. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(3), 391427.

  • 23.

    Jacob, R., Hill, H., & Corey, D. (2017). The impact of a professional development program on teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching, instruction, and student achievement. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 10(2), 379407.

  • 24.

    Johnson, E. M. S., & Larsen, S. P. (2012). Teacher listening: The role of knowledge of content and students. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31(1), 117129.

  • 25.

    Kastberg, S. E., D’Ambrosio, B., & Lynch-Davis, K. (2012). Understanding proportional reasoning for teaching. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 68(3), 3240.

  • 26.

    Kazemi, E., & Franke, M. L. (2004). Teacher learning in mathematics; Using student work to promote collective inquiry. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7(3), 203235.

  • 27.

    Leavy, A. M., & Hourigan, M. (2016). Using lesson study to support knowledge development in initial teacher education: Insights from early number classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 57, 161175.

  • 28.

    Lesh, R., Post, T., & Behr, M. (1988). Proportional reasoning. In J. Hiebert & M. Behr (Eds.), Number concepts and operations in the middle grades (pp. 93118). Erlbaum; National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

  • 29.

    Lesseig, K. (2016). Investigating Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching Proof in Professional Development. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 2(2), 253270.

  • 30.

    Lobato, J., Orrill, C. H., Druken, B., & Jacobson, E. (2011, April 8–12). Middle school teachers’ knowledge of proportional reasoning for teaching [Paper presentation]. As part of the symposium, extending, expanding, and applying the construct of mathematical knowledge for teaching at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, USA.

  • 31.

    Loucks-Horsley, S., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., Hewson, P. W., & Love, N. (2010). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics (3rd ed.). Corwin.

  • 32.

    Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

  • 33.

    Özgün-Koca, S. A., & Kayhan, M. (2009). An investigation of proportional reasoning skills of middle school students. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 2(1), 2648.

  • 34.

    Pianta, R. C., & Hamré, B. K. (2009). Conceptualization, measurement, and improvement of classroom practices: Standardized observation can leverage capacity. Educational Researcher, 38(2), 109119.

  • 35.

    Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 415.

  • 36.

    Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 414.

  • 37.

    Smith, M. S., Bill, V., & Hughes, E. K. (2008). Thinking through a lesson: Successfully implementing high-level tasks. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 14(3), 132138.

  • 38.

    Wayne, A. J., Yoon, K. S., Zhu, P., Cronen, S., & Garet, M. S. (2008). Experimenting with teacher professional development: Motives and methods. Education Researcher, 37(8), 469479.

  • 39.

    Yoon, K. S., Duncan, T., Lee, S. W.-Y., Scarloss, B., & Shapley, K. (2007). Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2007–No.033). U. S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest.

  • Fostering Middle School Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching via Analysis of Tasks and Student Work (2024)

    FAQs

    What is pedagogical content knowledge in math teaching? ›

    Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) and understanding of teachers is defined as involving the relationship between knowledge of teaching materials, how to transfer the subject matter, and the knowledge of students in mathematics on limit algebraic functions that the subject matter may be understood by students.

    What is the mathematical task of teaching? ›

    Mathematical-task knowledge for teaching deals with the knowledge teachers need in order to (a) select and develop tasks to promote students' conceptual understanding of mathematics, support their development of mathematical thinking, and capture their interest and curiosity and (b) optimize the learning potential of ...

    What is mathematical knowledge for teaching? ›

    Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching (MKT) encompasses abilities such as analyzing the student thinking that led to an incorrect answer, identifying the mathematical understanding a student does not yet have, and deciding how to best represent a mathematical idea so that it can be understood by students.

    What are the 5 pedagogy practices in math? ›

    Take a deeper dive into understanding the five practices—anticipating, monitoring, selecting, sequencing, and connecting—for facilitating productive mathematical conversations in your high school classrooms... read more. Enhance your fluency in the five practices—anticipating, monitoring, selecting, ... read more.

    What is content analysis in pedagogy of math? ›

    Essence of content analysis.

    Content means subject matter of any subject and Analysis means breaking down complex topic into smaller sub topics. So before starting teaching a teacher go through the whole content and break the major concepts into the systematic and meaningful minor concepts or simple concepts.

    What are the four methods used in teaching math? ›

    Some common methods of teaching mathematics include direct instruction , problem - based learning , inquiry - based learning , and collaborative learning . Each of these methods has its own unique approach and benefits , but all aim to engage students and facilitate their understanding of mathematical concepts .

    What are the 8 mathematical practices in teaching math? ›

    Standards for Mathematical Practice
    • Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them. ...
    • Reason abstractly and quantitatively. ...
    • Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others. ...
    • Model with mathematics. ...
    • Use appropriate tools strategically. ...
    • Attend to precision. ...
    • Look for and make use of structure.
    Jul 25, 2023

    What is a cognitive task analysis in math? ›

    Cognitive Task Analysis means to teach students not just the content, but how to think about the content. For example, if a student is struggling in maths, rather than assigning more exercises you might teach the student to "see" the information through a drawing or manipulative.

    What are the 5 components of mathematical knowledge students should acquire? ›

    5 Critical Components For Mathematical Proficiency
    • CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING. ...
    • PROCEDURAL FLUENCY. ...
    • STRATEGIC COMPETENCE. ...
    • ADAPTIVE REASONING. ...
    • PRODUCTIVE DISPOSITION.
    Dec 21, 2020

    What are the three types of mathematical knowledge? ›

    Piaget identified three types of mathametical knowledge. Namely social knowledge,physical knowledge and logic mathematical knowledge.

    What are the qualities of a good mathematics teacher? ›

    They possess essential math teacher skills such as passion, clear communication, patience, adaptability, organizational skills, accessibility, continuous learning, and the ability to foster collaborative learning—collectively creating an environment where students can thrive in their mathematical journey.

    What are examples of pedagogical content knowledge? ›

    Within the category of pedagogical content knowledge I include, for the most regularly taught topics in one's subject area, the most useful forms of representation of those ideas, the most powerful analogies, illustrations, examples, explanations, and demonstrations - in a word, the ways of representing and formulating ...

    What is the pedagogical approach in math? ›

    Effective teachers understand that the tasks and examples they select influence how students come to view, develop, use, and make sense of mathematics. modelling tasks, in particular, require students to interpret a context and then to make sense of the embedded mathematics.

    What are the three elements of pedagogical content knowledge? ›

    He further proposed several key elements of pedagogical content knowledge: (1) knowledge of representations of subject matter (content knowledge); (2) understanding of students' conceptions of the subject and the learning and teaching implications that were associated with the specific subject matter; and (3) general ...

    What are the four categories of pedagogical content knowledge? ›

    Barnett and Hodson (2001) believe that good teachers employ four categories PCK in their teaching, which are: (1) knowledge of learners' existing knowledge; (2) knowledge of effective teaching/learning strategies according to particular content; (3) alternative ways of representing the subject matter; and (4) ...

    References

    Top Articles
    Latest Posts
    Recommended Articles
    Article information

    Author: Jamar Nader

    Last Updated:

    Views: 6248

    Rating: 4.4 / 5 (55 voted)

    Reviews: 86% of readers found this page helpful

    Author information

    Name: Jamar Nader

    Birthday: 1995-02-28

    Address: Apt. 536 6162 Reichel Greens, Port Zackaryside, CT 22682-9804

    Phone: +9958384818317

    Job: IT Representative

    Hobby: Scrapbooking, Hiking, Hunting, Kite flying, Blacksmithing, Video gaming, Foraging

    Introduction: My name is Jamar Nader, I am a fine, shiny, colorful, bright, nice, perfect, curious person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.